Karl Friston's Rules for Reviewing

This post was orphaned a while back when I was testing links to papers, but I figured I should go back and explain what I was doing. This is a link to Friston's recent Neuroimage paper giving advice to young reviewers for how to reject any paper, regardless of how scientifically and statistically sound it is. His tone is purposely ironic, although he takes a more serious turn at the end in explaining why these rejection criteria are ridiculous.

The link to Friston's paper can be found here.